Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups: 2 IU Simon Cancer Center researchers' breast cancer trials offer greatest potential to improve treatment, survival
INDIANAPOLIS -- (Nov. 21, 2008) -- Two breast cancer clinical trials led by Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center researchers are among 13 considered to have the greatest potential to improve treatment and survival.
A panel of breast cancer experts convened by the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups (CCCG) recently identified clinical trials led by Kathy Miller, M.D., and Victoria Champion, R.N., D.N.S., F.A.A.N., among 13 phase III breast cancer research studies from more than 515 currently underway.
Miller is the principal investigator of “A Double-Blind Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel with Bevacizumab or Placebo in Patients with Lymph Node Positive and High Risk Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer” and Champion leads “Quality of Life in Younger Breast Cancer Survivors.”
The CCCG’s Scientific Leadership Council (SLC) in Breast Cancer outlined its consensus -- Research Priorities in Breast Cancer: Recommendations of the Scientific Leadership Council in Breast Cancer of the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups -- at a meeting of physicians, researchers, patient advocates, government, and industry representatives in Dallas Sept. 12-13, and urged physicians to enroll as many of their eligible patients into the trials as possible.
Rapid enrollment and timely completion of these 13 studies can quicken the pace of diagnostic and treatment advances by resolving clinical questions such as:
- How to predict the impact of biological effects of chemopreventive agents with the development and validation of new, clinically relevant biomarkers
- How to design, select, and afford individualized cancer therapy in an era of escalating costs for biologic treatments
- How, when, and whether to use chemotherapy in breast cancer treatment for some patients
- How to best incorporate novel approaches, including biophosphonates in breast cancer treatment to reduce the risk of bone metastases
- How best to address the growing issue of long-term neurotoxic and cognitive side effects in breast cancer survivors
- How to design clinical trials that can be completed more efficiently, including randomized discontinuation trials or “adaptive” trial designs that require fewerpatients and/or shorter study duration
According to the American Cancer Society, breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the United States, other than skin cancer. It is the second leading cause of cancer death in women, after lung cancer. About 182,460 women in the United States will be found to have invasive breast cancer in 2008; about 40,480 women will die from the disease this year.
Research indicates that only about 15 percent of all breast cancer patients are aware of clinical trials at the time of their diagnosis, according to the CCCG.
The CCCG’s TrialCheck is an Internet-based system of all federally registered cancer studies that links patients to clinical trial information. It can be accessed at www.CancerTrialsHelp.org.
Other helpful tools include the IU Simon Cancer Center’s clinical trial database (http://cancer.iu.edu/research-trials/trials/index.shtml) as well as databases from the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute.